آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 13 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 664 |
| تعداد مقالات | 6,944 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,196,994 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,426,982 |
Unlocking the Benefits of Organic Selenium: How Different Levels Affect Laying Hen Health and Egg Quality | ||
| Poultry Science Journal | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 14، شماره 1، فروردین 2026، صفحه 109-116 اصل مقاله (735.37 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/psj.2025.23711.2331 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Tara Mirzaei1؛ Maryam Tajabadi-Ebrahimi* 2؛ Mehrdad Azin3؛ Behin Omidi1؛ Seyed Naser Mousavi4 | ||
| 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Basic Science,Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Biotechnology, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Department of Animal Science, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study evaluated the effects of organic selenium supplementation at different concentrations on laying hen performance, egg quality, and antioxidant status. We hypothesized that increasing levels of organic selenium would improve egg quality, antioxidant capacity, and Se deposition, outperforming inorganic selenium. This study provides novel insights by using a unique yeast strain (PTCC5052) and evaluating nonlinear Se dose–response patterns. A total of 360 Super Nick hens (38 weeks old) were randomly assigned to six groups and fed either a control diet (no selenium), a diet with 0.3 mg/kg Se from an inorganic source, or 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mg/kg Se from an organic source derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae PTCC5052—a unique yeast strain. Over 10 weeks, egg production, feed conversion ratio, egg quality, and Se deposition in eggs were assessed. Production performance was not significantly affected by selenium supplementation. However, hens receiving 0.3 and 0.4 mg/kg of organic Se showed significantly thicker eggshells and higher egg selenium content (p < 0.05). Antioxidant enzyme activities (glutathione peroxidase, superoxide dismutase) were significantly enhanced in organic Se groups, while malondialdehyde levels were reduced (p < 0.05). The strongest antioxidant capacity was observed at 0.1–0.2 mg/kg Se, suggesting a nonlinear dose–response pattern. Serum protein, uric acid, AST, and ALT remained unchanged. These results demonstrate that organic selenium from S. cerevisiae PTCC5052 improves egg quality and antioxidant capacity without affecting production performance, highlighting the importance of selenium source and dose–response dynamics. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Laying hens؛ Organic؛ Selenium؛ Egg quality؛ Antioxidants | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdel Magied HA, Selim NA, Habib HH, El-Komy H & Mostafa MA. 2020. Strengthening the antioxidant status of laying hens through summer season by using different categories of antioxidant sources. Journal of Animal and Poultry Production, 11: 539–547. DOI: 10.21608/jappmu.2020.161183
Abdelqader A, Irshaid R & Al-Fataftah AR. 2013. Effects of dietary probiotic inclusion on performance, eggshell quality, cecal microflora composition, and tibia traits of laying hens in the late phase of production. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 45: 1017–1024. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-012-0326-7
Abou-Ashour A, Zanaty G, Abou El-Naga MK, Darwish A & Hussein EA. 2023. Utilization of dietary zinc oxide nanoparticles on productive and physiological performance of local laying hens. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds, 26: 429–442. DOI: 10.21608/ejnf.2023.332940
Agus A, Planchais J & Sokol H. 2018. Gut microbiota regulation of tryptophan metabolism in health and disease. Cell Host & Microbe, 23: 716–724. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.05.003
Ahmad H, Tian J, Wang J, Khan MA, Wang Y, Zhang L & Wang T. 2012. Effects of dietary sodium selenite and selenium yeast on antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative stability of chicken breast meat. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60: 7111–7120. DOI: 10.1021/jf3017207
Alagawany M, Qattan SY, Attia YA, El-Saadony MT, Elnesr SS, Mahmoud MA, Madkour M, Abd El-Hack ME & Reda FM. 2021. Use of chemical nano-selenium as an antibacterial and antifungal agent in quail diets and its effect on growth, carcasses, antioxidant, immunity and caecal microbes. Animals, 11: 3027. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113027
Arpášová H, Petrovič V, Mellen M, Kačániová M, Čobanová K & Leng L. 2009. The effects of supplementing sodium selenite and selenized yeast to the diet for laying hens on the quality and mineral content of eggs. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 18: 90–100. DOI: 10.22358/jafs/66371/2009
Attia YA, Al-Harthi MA & Abo El-Maaty HM. 2020. The effects of different oil sources on performance, digestive enzymes, carcass traits, biochemical, immunological, antioxidant, and morphometric responses of broiler chicks. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7: 181. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00181
Bai SP, Jin G, Li DL, Ding XM, Wang JP, Zhang KY, Zeng QF, Ji FJ & Zhao JM. 2017. Dietary organic trace minerals level influences eggshell quality and minerals retention in hens. Annals of Animal Science, 17: 761–774. DOI: 10.1515/aoas-2016-0074
Bao YM, Choct M, Iji P & Bruerton K. 2010. Trace mineral interactions in broiler chicken diets. British Poultry Science, 51: 109–117. DOI: 10.1080/00071660903571904
Baylan M, Canogullari S, Ayasan T & Copur G. 2011. Effects of dietary selenium source, storage time, and temperature on the quality of quail eggs. Biological Trace Element Research, 143: 957–964. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-010-8912-x
Bodnar M, Konieczka P & Namiesnik J. 2012. The properties, functions, and use of selenium compounds in living organisms. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C, 30: 225–252. DOI: 10.1080/10590501.2012.705164
Chen J, Xing Y, Nie M, Xu M, Huang H, Xie H, Liao J, Lin X, Duan J & Zhang J. 2024. Comparative effects of various dietary selenium sources on growth performance, meat quality, essential trace elements content, and antioxidant capacity in broilers. Poultry Science, 103: 104057. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104057
Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P, Thosaikham W, Atiwetin P, Chumpawadee S, Saenthaweesuk S & Chantiratikul A. 2009. Effect of selenium-enriched bean sprout and other selenium sources on productivity and selenium concentration in eggs of laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 22: 1661–1666. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2009.90220
De Nicola R, Hall N, Bollag T, Thermogiannis G & Walker GM. 2009. Zinc accumulation and utilization by wine yeasts. International Journal of Wine Research, 1: 1–10. DOI: 10.2147/IJWR.S4570
Elnesr SS, Mahmoud BY, da Silva Pires PG, Moraes P, Elwan HA, El-Shall NA, El-Kholy MS & Alagawany M. 2024. Trace minerals in laying hen diets and their effects on egg quality. Biological Trace Element Research, 202: 5664–5679. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-024-04121-8
Fingerova H, Novotny J, Barborik J, Brezinova J, Svobodova M, Krskova M & Oborna I. 2007. Antioxidant capacity of seminal plasma measured by TAS Randox®. Biomedical Papers, 151: 37–40. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2007.006
Fisinin V, Papazyan T & Surai P. 2008. Selenium in poultry nutrition. In: Current Advances in Selenium Research and Applications. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. Pages 221–261. DOI: 10.3920/9789086866427_012
Gong A, Liu W, Lin Y, Huang L & Xie Z. 2023. Adaptive laboratory evolution reveals the selenium efflux process to improve selenium tolerance mediated by the membrane sulfite pump in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology Spectrum, 11: e01326-23. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01326-23
Hachemi MA, Cardoso D, De Marco M, Geraert PA & Briens M. 2023. Inorganic and organic selenium speciation of seleno-yeasts used as feed additives: new insights from elemental selenium determination. Biological Trace Element Research, 201: 5839–5847. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-023-03633-z
Han X, Qin P, Li W, Ma Q, Ji C, Zhang J & Zhao L. 2017. Effect of sodium selenite and selenium yeast on performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, and selenium deposition of laying hens. Poultry Science, 96: 3973–3980. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pex216
Islam Z, Ikram M, Naz S, Sultan A, Khan K, Alhidary IA, Tiwari R & Khan RU. 2024. Effect of selenium-enriched yeast diet on performance, biochemistry, and selenium concentration in meat and egg contents of laying Japanese quails. Archives of Animal Breeding, 67: 493–502. DOI: 10.5194/aab-67-493-2024
Khan RU, Al-Khalaifah H, Usama M, Naz S, Khan S, Batool S, Alrefaei AF, Konca Y, Abdelrahman S & Selvaggi M. 2025. Effect of dietary supplementation of biosynthesized nano-selenium particles on growth, blood indices, antioxidant status, immune response and histological features of intestine in broilers. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 36: 2529315. DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2025.2529315
Kieliszek M & Błażejak S. 2013. Selenium: significance and outlook for supplementation. Nutrition, 29: 713–718. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.11.012
Lipiec E, Siara G, Bierla K, Ouerdane L & Szpunar J. 2010. Determination of selenomethionine, selenocysteine, and inorganic selenium in eggs by HPLC–inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 397: 731–741. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3650-9
Lu J, Qu L, Ma M, Li Y, Wang X, Yang Z & Wang K. 2020. Efficacy evaluation of selenium-enriched yeast in laying hens: effects on performance, egg quality, organ development, and selenium deposition. Poultry Science, 99: 6267–6277. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.041
Lu J, Qu L, Shen M, Hu Y, Guo J, Dou T & Wang K. 2018. Comparison of dynamic change of egg selenium deposition after feeding sodium selenite or selenium-enriched yeast. Poultry Science, 97: 3102–3108. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey161
Madi M, Babu S, Kumari S, Shetty S, Achalli S, Madiyal A & Bhat M. 2016. Status of serum and salivary levels of superoxide dismutase in type 2 diabetes mellitus with oral manifestations: a case control study. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, 26: 523–532. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v26i6.4
Novoselec J, Klir Šalavardić Ž, Đidara M, Novoselec M, Vuković R, Ćavar S & Antunović Z. 2022. The effect of maternal dietary selenium supplementation on blood antioxidant and metabolic status of ewes and their lambs. Antioxidants, 11: 1664. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11091664
Pavlović Z, Miletić I, Jokić Ž & Šobajić S. 2009. The effect of dietary selenium source and level on hen production and egg selenium concentration. Biological Trace Element Research, 131: 263–270. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-009-8369-y
Piray A, Mahdavi R & Mousaie A. 2025. Assessing the effectiveness of nano-selenium as a mineral supplement for broiler chickens: a dose–response meta-analysis of existing research. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 81: 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/00439339.2025.2468695
Powers SK & Jackson MJ. 2008. Exercise-induced oxidative stress: cellular mechanisms and impact on muscle force production. Physiological Reviews, 88: 1243–1276. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2007
Qiu K, Zheng JJ, Obianwuna UE, Wang J, Zhang HJ, Qi GH & Wu SG. 2021. Effects of dietary selenium sources on physiological status of laying hens and production of selenium-enriched eggs. Frontiers in Nutrition, 8: 726770. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.726770
Skrivan M, Simane J, Dlouhá G & Doucha J. 2006. Effect of dietary sodium selenite, Se-enriched yeast and Se-enriched Chlorella on egg Se concentration, physical parameters of eggs and laying hen production. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51: 163–170. DOI: 10.17221/3924-CJAS
Stibilj V, Vadnjal R, Kovač M & Holcman A. 2004. The effect of dietary arsenic additions on the distribution of selenium and iodine in eggs and tissues of laying hens. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 46: 275–280. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-003-2276-6
Surai PF & Kochish II. 2019. Nutritional modulation of the antioxidant capacities in poultry: the case of selenium. Poultry Science, 98: 4231–4239. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez072
Tan W, Yang S, Song M, Zhang S, Wang X, Liu L, Li S, Yuan Y & Yue T. 2025. Screening and characterization of organic Se-enriched yeasts via engineering combined lab-adaptive evolution strategies to produce fragrant cider. Food Research International, 188: 116549. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116549
Thiry C, Ruttens A, De Temmerman L, Schneider YJ & Pussemier L. 2012. Current knowledge in species-related bioavailability of selenium in food. Food Chemistry, 130: 767–784. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.102
Utterback P, Parsons C, Yoon I & Butler J. 2005. Effect of supplementing selenium yeast in diets of laying hens on egg selenium content. Poultry Science, 84: 1900–1901. DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.12.1900
Vlaicu PA & Untea AE. 2025. Technologies for mineral-enriched eggs. In: Designer Poultry Eggs. Elsevier, London. Pages 101–130. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-443-34262-2.00008-7
Wang W, Kang R, Liu M, Wang Z, Zhao L, Zhang J, Huang S & Ma Q. 2022. Effects of different selenium sources on the laying performance, egg quality, antioxidant, and immune responses of laying hens under normal and cyclic high temperatures. Animals, 12: 1006. DOI: 10.3390/ani12081006
Yuan D, Zhan X & Wang Y. 2011. Effects of selenium sources and levels on reproductive performance and selenium retention in broiler breeder, egg, developing embryo, and 1-day-old chick. Biological Trace Element Research, 144: 705–714. DOI: 10.1007/s12011-011-9111-0
Zhang K, Han M, Dong Y, Miao Z, Zhang J, Song X, Feng Y, Li H, Zhang L & Wei Q. 2021. Low levels of organic compound trace elements improve the eggshell quality, antioxidant capacity, immune function, and mineral deposition of aged laying hens. Animal, 15: 100401. DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100401
Zhang X, Tian L, Zhai S, Lin Z, Yang H, Chen J, Ye H, Wang W, Yang L & Zhu Y. 2020. Effects of selenium-enriched yeast on performance, egg quality, antioxidant balance, and egg selenium content in laying ducks. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7: 591. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00591 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 68 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 38 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب