آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 13 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 631 |
| تعداد مقالات | 6,584 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,926,707 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,456,975 |
The impact of cultivation methods on environmental sustainability in paddy farming: A comparative analysis using life cycle assessment and cumulative exergy demand | ||
| Environmental Resources Research | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 12، شماره 1، مهر 2024، صفحه 113-130 اصل مقاله (1.41 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/ijerr.2024.22094.1421 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Farshad Haghjooy Maklavani1؛ Mohammad Gholami Parashkoohi* 2؛ Davood Mohammad Zamani1؛ Hamed Afshari3 | ||
| 1Department of Biosystem Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Food Science and Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Earth Resources Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Paddy cultivation has a significant impact on the environment, especially concerning water usage and greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, a life cycle assessment (LCA) and cumulative exergy demand (CExD) analysis were carried out to compare the environmental effects of paddy cultivation under various scenarios. The ReCiPe2016 method was utilized to evaluate three different impact categories. Specifically, for the Hashemi variety, the resource impact category for conventional and mechanized methods was 162.82 and 182.25 USD2013, respectively. For the Khazar variety, the resource impact category for conventional and mechanized methods was 112.49 and 126.19 USD2013, respectively. The ecosystem category showed the lowest environmental emissions. It was found that electricity was the primary contributor, accounting for over 40% of the environmental emissions across all damage categories. The CExD method identified seven types of energy, with non-renewable fossil energy showing significant values in both conventional and mechanized cultivation of the Hashemi variety (21666.32 and 24537.68 MJ ton–1) as well as for the Khazar variety (14938.53 and 16847.06 MJ ton–1). Mechanized cultivation of the Khazar variety exhibited a notable energy output of 1498.68 MJ ton–1 of renewable biomass energy. By conducting a thorough comparison using LCA and CExD, it becomes possible to pinpoint the most sustainable practices for paddy cultivation, considering the full scope of environmental impacts and resource consumption. This valuable information can guide decision-making and facilitate the development of more sustainable agricultural practices. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Agricultural practices؛ Cumulative exergy demand (CExD)؛ Greenhouse gas emissions؛ Life cycle assessment (LCA)؛ ReCiPe2016 method | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Algarni, S., Tirth, V., Alqahtani, T., Alshehery, S., and Kshirsagar, P. 2023. Contribution of renewable energy sources to the environmental impacts and economic benefits for sustainable development. Sustain. Energy Technology Assessments. 56, 103098.
Cheng, H., Zhou, X., Yang, Y., Xu, L., Ding, Y., Yan, T., and Li, Q. 2024. Environmental damages, cumulative exergy demand, and economic assessment of Panus giganteus farming with the application of solar technology. Science of The Total Environment. 907, 168020.
Devendra, C., and Leng, R.A. 2011. Feed Resources for Animals in Asia: Issues, Strategies for Use, Intensification and Integration for Increased Productivity. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 24, 303–321.
Dreyer, L.C., Niemann, A.L., and Hauschild, M.Z. 2003. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99: Does it matter which one you choose? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.
Elyasi, S.N., Marami, H., He, L., Kaab, A., Pan, J., Liu, H., and Khoshnevisan, B. 2022. Up and Downstream Technologies of Anaerobic Digestion from Life Cycle Assessment Perspective 361–389.
Fallahpour, F., Aminghafouri, A., Ghalegolab Behbahani, A., and Bannayan, M. 2012. The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Environment, Development and Sustainability.14, 979–992.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Kaab, A., and Rafiee, S. 2020. Application of life cycle analysis to assess environmental sustainability of wheat cultivation in the west of Iran. Energy. 193, 116768.
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Kaab, A., Rafiee, S., and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. 2022. A comparative of modeling techniques and life cycle assessment for prediction of output energy, economic profit, and global warming potential for wheat farms. Energy Reports. 8, 4922–4934.
Guo, Y., Xiao, L., Jin, L., Yan, S., Niu, D., and Yang, W. 2022. Effect of commercial slow-release urea product on in vitro rumen fermentation and ruminal microbial community using RUSITEC technique. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 13.
Hauschild, M., and Barlaz, M.A. 2010. LCA in Waste Management: Introduction to Principle and Method, in: Solid Waste Technology & Management. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, pp. 111–136.
Hokazono, S., and Hayashi, K. 2012. Variability in environmental impacts during conversion from conventional to organic farming: a comparison among three rice production systems in Japan. Journal Cleaner Production. 28, 101–112.
IPCC, 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. 2. Inst. Glob. Environ. Strateg. Hayama, Japan.
Iriarte, A., Rieradevall, J., and Gabarrell, X. 2010. Life cycle assessment of sunflower and rapeseed as energy crops under Chilean conditions. Journal Cleaner Production. 18, 336–345.
Jirapornvaree, I., Suppadit, T., and Kumar, V. 2021. Assessing the economic and environmental impact of jasmine rice production: Life cycle assessment and Life Cycle Costs analysis. Journal Cleaner Production. 303, 127079.
Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., and Rosenbaum, R. 2003. IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. International Journal of life cycle Assessment. 8, 324.
Kaab, A., Ghasemi Mobtaker, H., and Sharifi, M. 2023. A study of changes in energy consumption trend and environmental indicators in the production of agricultural crops using a life cycle assessment approach in the years 2018-2022. Journal of Biological Engineering. 54 (3), 1-18.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., and Chau, K. 2019a. Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production. Energy. 181, 1298–1320.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., Mobli, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., and Chau, K. 2019b. Combined life cycle assessment and artificial intelligence for prediction of output energy and environmental impacts of sugarcane production. Science Total Environment. 664, 1005–1019.
Kaab, A., Sharifi, M., and Moradi, H. 2021. Analysis of Energy Indicators and Environmental Impacts of Dryland Cantaloupe Production with Life Cycle Assessment Approach (Case Study: Ilam). Journal of Agricultural Machinery. 11, 491–504.
Kaab, A., Khanali, M., Shadamanfar, S., and Jalalvand, M. 2024. Assessment of energy audit and environmental impacts throughout the life cycle of barley production under different irrigation systems. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 100357.
Kazemi, N., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., Mohammadi, A., and Mohammad Zamani, D. 2023. Environmental life cycle assessment and energy-economic analysis in different cultivation of microalgae-based optimization method. Results in Engineering. 19, 101240.
Keramati, A., Pajoum Shariati, F., Tavakoli, O., Akbari, Z., and Rezaei, M. 2021. The effect of audible sound frequency on the growth and beta-carotene production of Dunaliella salina. South African J. Bot. 141, 373–382.
Khan, Muhammad Azam, Khan, S., Khan, M A, and Latif, N. 2010. Energy requirements and economic analysis of wheat, rice and barley production in Australia Introduction of Rain Water Harvesting in a remote area of Dera Ismail Khan District of Pakistan. View project Energy requirements and economic analysis of wheat. Soil Environment. 29.
Khan, S., Khan, M.A., Hanjra, M.A., and Mu, J. 2009. Pathways to reduce the environmental footprints of water and energy inputs in food production. Food Policy. 34, 141–149.
Khanali, M., Mobli, H., and Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H. 2017. Modeling of yield and environmental impact categories in tea processing units based on artificial neural networks. Environ. Science Pollution Research. 24, 26324–26340.
Khosruzzaman, S., Asgar, M.A., Karim, N., and Akbar, S. 2010. Energy intensity and productivity in relation to agriculture-Bangladesh perspective. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 6, 615–630.
Koga, N., Tajima, R., 2011. Assessing energy efficiencies and greenhouse gas emissions under bioethanol-oriented paddy rice production in northern Japan. Journal of Environmental Management. 92, 967–973.
Kosemani, B.S., and Bamgboye, A.I. 2020. Energy input-output analysis of rice production in Nigeria. Energy. 207, 118258.
Kouchaki-Penchah, H., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., O’Dwyer, J., and Sharifi, M., 2017. Environmental management of tea production using joint of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis approaches. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy.36.
Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture of Iran. 2021. Annual Agricultural Statistics. www.maj.ir (in Persian).
Mohammadi Kashka, F., Tahmasebi Sarvestani, Z., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., Nadi, M., and Valipour, M. 2023. Sustainable Systems Engineering Using Life Cycle Assessment: Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Agro-Environmental Footprint. Sustainability.15, 6326 15, 6326.
Mostashari-Rad, F., Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Taki, M., Ghahderijani, M., Kaab, A., Chau, K. W., and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. 2021. Exergoenvironmental damages assessment of horticultural crops using ReCiPe2016 and cumulative exergy demand frameworks. Journal of Cleaner Production. 278, 123788.
Mohammadi, A., Rafiee, S., Jafari, A., Keyhani, A., Dalgaard, T., Knudsen, M.T., Nguyen, T.L.T., Borek, R., and Hermansen, J.E. 2015. Joint Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis for the benchmarking of environmental impacts in rice paddy production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 106, 521–532.
Molaee Jafrodi, H., Gholami Parashkoohi, M., Afshari, H., and Mohammad Zamani, D. 2022. Comparative life cycle cost-energy and cumulative exergy demand of paddy production under different cultivation scenarios: A case study. Ecological Indicators. 144, 109507.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S.S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., and Chau, K.W. 2018. Integration of artificial intelligence methods and life cycle assessment to predict energy output and environmental impacts of paddy production. Science Total Environment. 631–632, 1279–1294.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohammadkashi, N., Chau, K. W., and Mostashari-Rad, F. 2022. Principle of life cycle assessment and cumulative exergy demand for biodiesel production: farm-to-combustion approach. In Synergy development in renewables assisted multi-carrier systems (pp. 127-169). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Nikkhah, A., Emadi, B., and Firouzi, S. 2015. Greenhouse gas emissions footprint of agricultural production in Guilan province of Iran. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments.12, 10–14.
Nunes, F.A., Seferin, M., Maciel, V.G., and Ayub, M.A.Z. 2017. Life Cycle Assessment comparison between brow parboiled rice produced under organic and minimal tillage cultivation systems. Journal of Cleaner Production. 161, 95–104.
Reyes, J.F., and Sepulveda, M.A., 2006. PM-10 emissions and power of a diesel engine fueled with crude and refined biodiesel from salmon oil. Fuel. 85, 1714–1719.
Saber, Z., Esmaeili, M., Pirdashti, H., Motevali, A., and Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. 2020. Exergoenvironmental-Life cycle cost analysis for conventional, low external input and organic systems of rice paddy production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 263, 121529.
Saber, Z., van Zelm, R., Pirdashti, H., Schipper, A.M., Esmaeili, M., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., and Huijbregts, M.A.J. 2021. Understanding farm-level differences in environmental impact and eco-efficiency: The case of rice production in Iran. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 27, 1021–1029.
Soam, S., Borjesson, P., Sharma, P.K., Gupta, R.P., Tuli, D.K., and Kumar, R. 2017. Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India. Bioresour. Technol. 228, 89–98.
Taki, M., and Yildizhan, H., 2018. Evaluation the sustainable energy applications for fruit and vegetable productions processes; case study: Greenhouse cucumber production. Journal of Cleaner Production. 199, 164–172.
Vural Gursel, I., Moretti, C., Hamelin, L., Jakobsen, L.G., Steingrimsdottir, M.M., Junginger, M., Høibye, L., and Shen, L. 2021. Comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of bio-based and petrochemical PET bottles. Science Total Environment. 793, 148642.
Yadav, G.S., Babu, S., Das, A., Mohapatra, K.P., Singh, R., Avasthe, R.K., and Roy, S., 2020. No-till and mulching enhance energy use efficiency and reduce carbon footprint of a direct-seeded upland rice production system. Journal of Cleaner Production. 271, 122700.
Zeng, Y., Ji, X.J., Lian, M., Ren, L.J., Jin, L.J., Ouyang, P.K., and Huang, H. 2011. Development of a temperature shift strategy for efficient docosahexaenoic acid production by a marine fungoid protist, Schizochytrium sp. HX-308. Applied Biochemistry Biotechnology. 164, 249–255. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 178 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 218 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب