آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 13 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 641 |
| تعداد مقالات | 6,692 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 9,146,233 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,588,781 |
Assessing the Morphological Diversity of Ethiopian Indigenous Chickens Using Multivariate Discriminant Analysis of Morphometric Traits for Sustainable Utilization and Conservation | ||
| Poultry Science Journal | ||
| دوره 9، شماره 1، شهریور 2021، صفحه 61-72 اصل مقاله (558.26 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/psj.2021.18469.1644 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| A Melesse* 1؛ A Tadele2؛ H Assefa3؛ K Taye4؛ T Kebede5؛ M Taye1؛ S Betsha1 | ||
| 1School of Animal and Range Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia | ||
| 2Department of Animal Science, Bonga University, Ethiopia | ||
| 3Department of Animal Science, Mizan Agricultural Technical Vocational Education and Training College, Mizan Teferi, Ethiopia | ||
| 4Department of Animal Science, Arsi University, Assela, Ethiopia | ||
| 5Department of Animal Sciences, Alage Agricultural Technical Vocational Education and Training College, Ethiopia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study aimed to differentiate indigenous chicken populations of four administrative zones including Kaffa, Sheka, Metekel, and Bale based on morphometric measurements using multivariate analysis. Data on quantitative traits were collected from 3069 adult indigenous chickens of both sexes. Live weight (LW), body length (BL), breast circumference (BC), wingspan (WS), shank length (SL), shank circumference (SC), keel length (KL), back length (BkL), and neck length (NL) were recorded. A cluster and discriminant analysis was applied to identify the combination of variables that best differentiate among chicken populations. Results indicated that Metekel chickens were characterized by higher LW, BL, KL, and BkL and differed from other groups (P < 0.05). Sheka chickens demonstrated the highest BC, WS, SL, SC, and NL being different from others (P < 0.05). Cluster analysis generated two distinct groups in which chickens of Bale and Sheka were clustered in one group while those of Metekel and Kaffa in another group each separated with sub-clusters. All Mahalanobis distances among the four chicken populations were significant being the shortest between Sheka and Bale chickens and the longest between those of Metekel and Bale (P < 0.0001). Three statistically significant (P < 0.001) canonical variables (CAN) were extracted of which CAN1 and CAN2 accounted for 73.2 and 14.6% of the total variations, respectively. The scatter plot generated by canonical discriminant analysis showed that CAN1 effectively discriminated between chickens of Metekel and Kaffa while the CAN2 best discriminated against those of Bale and Sheka. The discriminant analysis correctly classified 95.3, 94.9, 92.3, and 82.2% of Metekel, Bale, Kaffa, and Sheka chickens into their origin population, respectively. The current study revealed that multivariate analysis of morphometric traits provided a practical basis for differentiating the indigenous chicken populations into different groups. However, the authors recommend genetic characterization studies to validate the detected morphometric-based differentiation in chicken populations. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Genetic variation؛ Morphometric trait؛ Indigenous chicken؛ Administrative zone؛ Multivariate analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ajayi OO, Adeleke MA, Sanni MT, Yakubu A, Peters SO, Imumorin IG, Ozoje MO, Ikeobi CON & Adebambo OA. 2012. Application of principal component and discriminant analysis to morpho-structural indices of indigenous and exotic chickens raised under intensive management system. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44 (6): 1247-1254. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-0065-1
Al-Atiyat RM. 2009. Diversity of chicken populations in Jordan determined using discriminant analysis of performance traits. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 11: 374-380.
Al-Atiyat RM, Aljumaah RS, Abudabos AM, Alotybi MN, Harron RM, Algawaan AS & Aljooan HS. 2017. Differentiation of free ranging chicken using discriminant analysis of phenotypic traits. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 46 (10):791-799. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-92902017001000001
Al-Qamashoui B, Simianer H, Kadim I & Weigend S. 2014. Assessment of genetic diversity and conservation priority of Omani local chickens using microsatellite markers. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46: 747–752. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-014-0558-9
Arandas JKG, da Silva NMV, Nascimento RB, Filho ECP, Brasil LHA & Ribeiro MN. 2017. Multivariate analysis as a tool for phenotypic characterization of an endangered breed. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 45: 152-158. DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2015.1125353
Azimu W, B. Manatbay, Li Y, Kaimaerdan D, Wang HE, Reheman A & Muhatai G. 2018. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of eight local chicken breeds of Southern Xinjiang. British Poultry Science, 59 (6): 629-635. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2018.1523537
CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2018/19. Agricultural Sample Survey. Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia. Volume II Report on livestock and livestock characteristics. https:// www.statsethiopia.gov.et/our-survey-reports.
Daikwo SI, Dike UA & Dim NI. 2015. Discriminant analysis of morphometric differences in the normal feathered and frizzle feathered chickens of north central Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension, 14: 12-15. DOI: 10.4314/as.v14i3.3
Dahloum L, Moula N, Halbouche M & Mignon-Grasteau S. 2016. Phenotypic characterization of the indigenous chickens (Gallus gallus) in the northwest of Algeria. Archive of Animal Breeding, 59: 79-90. DOI: 10.5194/aab-59-79-2016
Dana N, Dessie T, van der Waaij LH & van Arendonk JAM. 2010. Morphological features of indigenous chicken populations of Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Resources, 46: 11-23. DOI: 10.1017/S2078633610000652
Egahi JO, Dim NI, Momoh OM & Gwaza DS. 2010. Variations in qualitative traits in the Nigerian local chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science 9: 978-979.
Egena SA, Ijaiya AT, Ogah DM & Aya VE. 2014. Principal component analysis of body measurements in a population of indigenous Nigerian chickens raised under extensive management systems. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 47: 77-82.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2012. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, No. 11. FAO, Rome. https:// www.fao.org/3/i2686e/i2686e00.pdf.
Fayeye TR, Hagan JK & Obadare AR. 2014. Morphometric traits and correlation between body weight and body size traits in Isa Brown and Ilorin Ecotype chickens. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4: 609-614.
Getachew F, Abegaz S, Abraham A, Manaye M, Emshaw Y, Abebe H, Misikire T & Cleopas O. 2016. Multivariate analyses of morphological traits in indigenous chicken populations of metekel zone, Northwestern Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Resources, 59: 15-25. DOI: 10.1017/ S2078633616000084
Getu A, Alemayehu K & Wuletaw Z. 2014. Canonical analysis for assessment of genetic diversity of three indigenous chicken ecotypes in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4 (4): 871-876.
Guni FS, Katule AM & Mwakilembe PAA. 2013. Characterization of local chickens in selected districts of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: II. Production and Morphometric traits. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 25: Article #190. Retrieved from https://www.lrrd.org /lrrd25 /11/guni25190.htm.
Gwaza DS, Noah ETT & Wamagi TI. 2013. Discriminant analysis of morphological traits in selected population of the Tiv local chicken ecotype in the derived Guinea Savanah of Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 3: 60-64.
Habimana R, Okeno TO, Ngeno K, Mboumba S, Assami P, Gbotto AA, Keambou CT, Nishimwe K, Mahoro J & Yao N. 2020. Genetic diversity and population structure of indigenous chicken in Rwanda using microsatellite markers. PLoS ONE, 15. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225084
Hassen H, Neser FWC & van Marle-Koster E. 2007. Village based indigenous chicken production system in north-west Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 39: 189–197. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-007-9004-6
Hassen H, Rischkowsky B, Termanini A, Jessry G, Haile A, Baum M & Lababidi S. 2016. Morphological and molecular genetic diversity of Syrian indigenous goat populations. African Journal of Biotechnology, 15: 745-758. DOI: 10. 5897/AJB2015.15062
Ikpeme EV, Kooffreh ME, Udensi OU, Ekerette EE, Ashishie LA & Ozoje MO. 2016. Multivariate-based genetic diversity analysis of three genotypes of Nigerian local chickens (Gallus domestica). International Journal of Science and Research methodology, 5: 1-12.
Melesse A & Negesse T. 2011. Phenotypic and morphological characterization of indigenous chicken populations in Southern region of Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Resources, 49: 19-31. DOI: 10.1017/S2078633611000099
Melesse A, Getye Y, Berihun K & Banerjee S. 2013. Effect of feeding graded levels of Moringa stenopetala leaf meal on growth performance, carcass traits and some serum biochemical parameters of Koekoek chickens. Livestock Science, 157: 498-505. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci. 2013.08.012
Melesse A. 2014. Significance of scavenging chicken production in the rural community of Africa for enhanced food security. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 70: 593-606. DOI: 10.1017/S004393391 4000646
Moula N, Luc DD, Dang PK, Farnir F, Ton VD, Binh DV, Leroy P & Antoine-Moussiaux N. 2011: The RI chicken breed and livelihoods in North Vietnam: Characterization and prospects. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, 112: 57-69.
Negassa D, Melesse A & Banerjee S. 2014. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken populations in Southeastern Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Resources, 55: 101-113. DOI: 10.1017/S2078633614000319
Neto VI, Barbosa FJV, Campelo JEG, Sarmento JLR, Santos NPS & Carvalho MDF. 2019. Phenotypic diversity between Brazilian fighting cocks and naturalized roosters. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 48: e20180271. DOI: 10.1590/rbz4820 180271
Ogah DM. 2013. Canonical discriminant analysis of morphometric traits in indigenous chicken genotypes. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 11: 170-174. https://tru.uni-sz.bg/tsj/N2,%20Vol.11,% 202013/D.M.Ogah.pdf.
Osei-Amponsah R, Kayang BB & Naazie A. 2012. Age, genotype and sex effects on growth performance of local chickens kept under improved management in Ghana. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44: 29-34. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-0010-3
Rosario MF, Silva MAN, Coelho AAD, Savino VJM & Dias CTS. 2008. Canonical discriminant analysis applied to broiler chicken performance. Animal, 2: 419-429.
Rotimi EA, Egahi JO & Adeoye AA. 2016. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous chicken population in Gwer-West, Benue State, Nigeria. World Scientific News, 53 (3): 343-353.
SAS (Statistical Analysis System). 2012. SAS for Windows, ver. 9.4. User’s Guide, SAS Institute Inc., North Carolina, USA. Turan C, Yalcin S, Turan F, Okur E & Akyurt I. 2005. Morphometric comparisons of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus, populations in Turkey. Folia Zoology, 54: 165-172. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/232066808.
Wodajo HD, Gemeda BA, Kinati W, Mulem AA, van Eerdewijk A & Wieland B. 2020. Contribution of small ruminants to food security for Ethiopian smallholder farmers. Small Ruminant Research, 184: 106064. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres. 2020.106064
Wölders H, Zuidberg CA & Hiemstra SJ. 2006. Animal genetic resources conservation in the Netherlands and Europe: Poultry perspective. Poultry Science, 85: 216-222. DOI: 10.1093/ps/ 85.2.216
Yakubu A & Ari MM. 2018. Principal component and discriminant analyses of body weight and conformation traits of Sasso, Kuroiler and indigenous Fulani chickens in Nigeria. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 28: 46-55. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,358 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 885 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب