آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 13 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 626 |
| تعداد مقالات | 6,517 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,746,523 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,317,329 |
Conservation and sustainable exploitation of plant genetic rsources: International developments | ||
| Environmental Resources Research | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 1، فروردین 2020، صفحه 55-63 اصل مقاله (161.71 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/ijerr.2020.5087 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| F. Alizadeh1؛ M.R. Parvin* 2؛ P. Farshchi3 | ||
| 1PhD candidate, Department of Environment and Energy, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Environment and Energy, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Plant Genetic Resources (PGRs) are one of the most valuable natural resources of any country. Biotechnology through genetic engineering of plants and the creation of new plant varieties can increase the value of these resources. Different technical and legal mechanisms such as ex situ/in situ collection of PGRs, and Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) indicate also an international institutional effort for sustainable use of biodiversity. Investigating international developments in the fields of exploitation and conservation of PGRs is therefore essential. The main purpose of this manuscript is to explore criteria that international legal instruments use for creating an appropriate interaction between conservation and exploitation of PGRs. These instruments have been especially developed in the two systems of international environmental law and intellectual property rights. Based on a descriptive analysis method, this research attempted to examine the provisions of these two legal instruments. Research findings indicate that intellectual property rights encourages the creation and development of green technologies, especially agrobiotechnology and protects Traditional Knowledge (TK) associated with PGRs as an appropriate tool for the sustainable exploitation of PGRs when implemented in a responsible manner. International environmental law paves also the way for biodiversity conservation through creation of binding and non-binding obligations for preserving genetic diversity on the planet. Sustainable conservation of PGRs requires an appropriate interaction between the two legal systems. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Precautionary principle؛ State sovereignty principle؛ Traditional knowledge؛ Geographical indications؛ Breeders' rights | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Altieri, M., and Nicholls, A. 2012. Agroecology Scaling Up for Food Sovereignty and Resiliency. J. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews. 11, 1-29.
Altieri, M.A., and Toledo, V.M. 2011. Theagroecological revolution in Latin America. J. Peasant Stud. 38, 587-612.
Ansari, A.H., and Wartini, S. 2013. Precautionary Principle under the SPS Agreement A Critical Exposition. J. Advances in Environmental Biology. 7 (4), 653-667.
Brookfield, H., Padoch, C., Parsons, H., and Stocking, M. 2002. Cultivating Biodiversity: Understanding, Analyzing and Using Agricultural Diversity. ITDG, London.
Brahmi, P., and Tyagi, V. 2017. Access and Benefit Sharing Mechanism under the Multilateral System of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food & Agriculture, in KP Laladhas et al. Biodiversity for Sustainable development Environmental Challenges and Solutions. 24, 17-30
Buyukgungo, H., and Levent, G. 2009. The Roie Biotechnology The Treatment of Wastest, African J. Biotechnology. 8, 25-29.
Derclaye, E. 2009. Patent law's role in the protection of the environment reassessing patent law and its justifications in the 21st century. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 40 (3), 249-273.
Daniell, H. 2014. Plant Biotechnology. J. 1, 146-212.
Dutfied, G. 2011. The Role of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, UPOV Quaker United Nation Office. 4, 7.
Garrity, D. 2010. Evergreen agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Secur. 2, 3-20.
Godfray, C., Beddington, J.R., Crute, I.R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J.F., Pretty, J., Robinson, L., and Toulmin, S.M. 2010. Food security the challenge of feeding 9 billion people Science. 327, 812-818.
Guerra, J.L. 2010. Georaphical Indications, in Situ Conservation and Traditional Knowledge. ICTSD Project on Genetic resources. 3, 1-15.
Hongyan, W., and Yuanyuan, S. 2013. Study on the Ownership of Plant Genetic Resources on Farmers Land. Asian Agricultural Research. 5 (02), 75-78.
Jaechel, A., Kristina, M., Gjerde, J., and Ardron, A. 2017. Conserving the Common Heritage of Humankind Options for the Deep Seabed Mining Regime. J. Marine Policy. 78, 150-157.
Khademi, H., and Abbasi, M. 2010. Protecting Genetic Resources in the Light Art. 4(d) of Iran Patent Industrial Designs and Trademarks Act I. J. Medical Law. 4 (12), 105-130.
Kiss, A., Sand, P.H., and Lang, W. 2011. Environmental law Persian Translation by Habibi Publishing Nashre Mizan. 1, 275-342.
Ling, C.Y., and Adams, B. 2016. Farmer Rights to Participate in Decision Making, APBREBES working paper. pp. 1-44.
Maftei, J. 2015 Sovereignty in International Law. J Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica Uni Danubius. 11 (1), 54-65.
Mariana, A.M., Nor Anita, A., StiNurani, M.N., and Chan, K.G. 2016. The Principle of Integration in International Sustainable Development Law with Reference to the Biological Weapons Convention Sustainability. 8 (166), 1-16.
Mashhadi, A., and Mohtashami, M. 2015. Reflection on Relationship between intellectual property law and environmental law. J. Private Law Studies. 45 (3), 485-504.
Momenirad, A., Shahabedin, A., and Azizi, N. 2013. Protection of biodiversity & Traditional Knowledge in World IP System. J. International Legal. 1 (49), 233-262.
Moody, O. 2016. Addressing Biopiracy through an Access and Benefit Sharing Regime Complex In Search of Effective Protection for Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources, pp. 231-280.
Morgera, E., and Kulovesi, K. 2016. Research Handbook on International Law and Natural Resources Publishing EE (Elgar), pp. 3-25.
Morgera, E. 2014. Conceptualizing BenefitSharing as the Pursuit of Equity in Addressing Global Environmental Challenges. BENELEX Working Edinburgh School of Law. pp. 1-41.
Milman, O. 2015. Earth has lost a third of arable land in past 40 years, scientists say, The Guardian: Wednesday 2 December.
Morgera, E. 2015. Justice, Equity and Benefit Sharing under the Nagoya Protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity. BENELEX Working. pp. 5-7.
Nezammaleki, J. 2015. How to Support Genetic Engineering Innovations in the System of Property Rights Thoughts and Rights of Iran. J. Medical Law. 9 (32), 119.
Nicholas, R.A., and Lai, L. 2011. Fundamentals of International Environmental Law Persian Translation by Hossini S.M. Tehran Nashre Mizan. pp. 493-513.
Parks, L., and Morgera, E. 2015. AnInterdisciplinary Model for Mapping the Normative Diffusion of Fair and Equitable Benefit Sharing. BENELEX Working. 1 (1), 7-9.
Parvin, M. R., and Vahedi Moghadam, S.N. 2019. IPRs & Transfer Technology in Agro-Biotechnology. ABRII.61-69.
Pathak, M., and Abide, M. 2014. The Role of Biotechnology in Conservation of Biodiversity. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Science. 2, 352-363.
Pereira Di, Salvo, C.G., and Raymond, R. 2010. Defining the Precautionary Principle an Empirical Analysis of Elite Discourse. J. Environmental Politics. 19 (1), 86-106.
Phoebe, H. 2013. Rights and Responsibilities in Patents A Precautionary Patent Framework in WTO Law. J. European Intellectual Property Review. 35 (9), 516-26.
Poorhashemi, S.A., and Arghand, B. 2013. International Environmental law. Publishing Nashre Dadgostar. pp. 254-280.
Qiqi, K.F., and Logan, K. 2017. Protecting the Public Environmental Right to Know: Development and Challenges in China’s Legislative System for EEID. J. Environmental Law. 29 (7), 285-315.
Rabitz, F. 2017. Managing Genetic Resources: International Regimes, Problem Structures National Implementation Earth System Governance Working. 37, 193.
Reynolds, G.J. 2013. The Precautionary Principle and its Application in the Intellectual Property Context: Towards a Public Domain Impact Assessment in Teresa ScassaMistraleGoudreauCourtneyDoagoo&MadelaineSaginurIntellectualProperyforthe 21st Century: Interdisciplinary Approaches. J. Toronto Irwin Law. pp. 95-113. Roa Rodriguez, Van C., and Dooren, T. 2008. Shifting Common Spaces of Plant Genetic Resources An International Regulatory Appraisal. J. World Intellectual Property. 11 (3), 176-202.
Schei, P.J., and Tvedt, W.M. 2010. Genetic Resources' in the CBD the Wording, the Past, the Present and the Future. Project ISSN. pp. 1504-9744. Schueler, B. 2008. Methods of Application of Proportionality Principle in Environmental Law. J. Legal Issues of Economic Integration. 35 (3), 231-240. Servant, H., and Michelangelo, T. 2010. Establishment of the national patent system of biotechnology. Comparative Law. 16 (1), 45-49.
Taghizadeh Ansari, M. 2014. International Environmental law. Publishing Khorsandi,pp. 211-221.
Tsioumani, E. 2014. Exploring Benefit Sharing from the Lab to the Land (Part 1): Agricultural Research and Development in the Context of Conservation and Sustainable. Edinburgh School of Law. pp. 40-44.
Vildasen, S.S., and Havenvid, M.I. 2018. The Role of Interaction for Corporate Sustainability. J. IMP. 12 (1), 148-170. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 295 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 251 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب