The study of row mixed cropping in Durum wheat (Triticum durum) genotypes underwater deficiency Conditions | ||
| پژوهشهای تولید گیاهی | ||
| Article 11, Volume 27, Issue 1, June 2020, Pages 179-196 PDF (1.32 M) | ||
| Document Type: scientific research article | ||
| DOI: 10.22069/jopp.2020.16095.2452 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Maryam Mirdoraghi1; Ali Behpoori* 2; Mmohamad Sadegh Taghizadeh2; Eehsan Bijanzadeh3; Manuchehr dastfal4 | ||
| 1M.Sc. Graduate of Agroecology, Darab Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Prof. of Agroecology, Darab Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Prof. of Agroecology, Darab Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Shiraz University, Darab, Iran | ||
| 4Faculty of Member, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center of Fars, Darab, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Abstract Background and objectives: Durum wheat is one of the major food for human consumption in the world and its growth and production has mainly influenced by drought stress. One of the possible ways of increasing food in a sustainable agriculture is to produce higher yields in the same cropping area. Mixed cropping as one of the methods and examples of sustainable agricultural try to follow the objectives such as ecological balance, exploitation of resources, quantitative and qualitative increase of yield, reduction of damage of pests, diseases and weeds. Reduction of farmer's dependence on pesticides is one of the other main goals in sustainable agriculture. In general, the aim of this experiment is to evaluate the effect of genetic diversity of genotypes on yield and grain yield components under water deficiency conditions after flowering in durum wheat mixed systems. Materials and methods: This experiment was conducted as split plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replicates at Darab College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Shiraz University, Darab. The factors included of two water regimes after flowering (normal and Water deficiency) and planting systems including pure culture of four durum wheat genotypes (pure culture of DW-92-4 , pure culture of DW-94-14, pure culture of Shabrang, pure culture of Behrang) and their binary mixed culture (mixed culture of DW-92-4+ Shabrang, mixed culture of DW-92-4+ DW-94-14, mixed culture of DW-92-4+ Behrang, mixed culture of DW-94-14+ Shabrang, mixed culture of Shabrang+ Behrang, mixed culture of DW-94-14+ Behrang and quadruple mixed culture of DW-94-14+ Behrang+ DW-92-4+ Shabrang). Results: According to the results of this experiment, maximum grain yield was observed in the treatment of binary mixed culture of Behrang+DW-94-14 genotypes with an average of 8815 kg ha-1, which did not have a significant difference with the quadruple mixed culture of 4 genotypes in normal irrigation conditions. The minimum grain yield observed in mixed culture of Behrang +Dw-92-4 with the average of 2233 kg ha-1 in water deficiency condition. Also, group comparison of treatments showed that the highest grain yield was obtained in quadruple culture of 4 genotypes with the average yield of 8799 kg ha -1in normal irrigation conditions. The analyses of correlation coefficient in this experiment showed that the highest positive correlation coefficient obtained between grain yield and biological yield (r = 0.76**) in water deficiency conditions. Also, the highest positive correlation coefficient was observed between grain yield and biological yield in normal irrigation conditions(r = 0.90 **). Conclusion: The use of mixed cropping of different genotypes of durum wheat affected yield and yield components in this experiment. Mixed cropping of genotypes of durum wheat showed the highest yield under normal irrigation conditions compared to water deficiency conditions. Overall, it seems that mixed cropping can be recommended for higher yields potential either under normal irrigation conditions or water deficiency conditions. Keywords: Drought stress, Genetic diversity, mixed varieties | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Keywords: drought stress; genetic diversity; mixed varieties | ||
| References | ||
|
1.Abdoli, M. and Saeidi, M. 2012. Using different indices for selection of resistant wheat cultivars to post anthesis water deficit in the west of Iran. Ann. Bio. Res. 3: 3. 1322-1333.
2.Afzali, S. 2014. Effects of genetic diversity and nitrogen fertilizers on wheat competitiveness in wheat farming system. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty. Agric. Shiraz Uni, Iran.(In Persian)
3.Attarbashi, M.R., Galeshi, S., Soltani,A. and Zeinali, E. 2002. Relationshipof phenology and physiological traits with grain yield in wheat underrainfed conditions. Iranian. J. Agri. Sci.33: 1. 21-28. (In Persian) 4.Darrs, S., Mckenzi, R.H., Olson, M.A. and Willenborg, C.J. 2015. Influence of genotypic mixtures on field pea yield and competitive ability. Canadian. J. Plan. Sci. 95: 31. 5-324.
5.Eskandari, H. and Ghanbari, A. 2009. Intercropping of maize and cowpeaas whole-crop forage: effect ofdifferent planting pattern on total drymatter production and maize forage quality. Nutritional. Bot. Hort. Agrobot.37: 2. 152-155.
6.Faramarzi, F. 2014. The effect of crop diversity on the weed population under the influence of nitrogen levels. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty. Agri, Shiraz Uni, Iran.
7.Fischer, R.A. 2008. The importance of grain or kernel number in wheat: a reply to Sinclair and Jamieson. Field. Crop. Res. 105: 15-21.
8.Forouzanfar, M., Bihamta, M.R., Peyghambary, A. and Zeynali, H. 2011. Evaluation of bread wheat genotypes under normal and water stress conditions for agronomic traits. J. Agri. Sci. Sust. Prod. 21: 3.
9.Guoth, A., Tari, I., Galle, A., Csiszar, J., Pecsvaradi, A., Cseuz, L. and Erdei, L. 2009. Comparison of the drought stress responses of tolerant and sensitive wheat cultivars during grain filling: Changes in flag leaf photosynthetic activity, ABA levels, and grain yield. J. Plan Growth. Reg. 28: 2. 167-176.
10.Jlali, V.R. and Asadi Kourchal, S. 2017. Simulation of durum wheat yield (Triticum turgidum L.) under salt stress conditions based on statistical models and macro models. Agri. Eco.2: 9. 520-534.
11.Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Mondani, F., Feizi, H. and Amirmoradi, S. 2009. Evaluation of radiation interception and use by maize and bean intercropping canopy. J. Agro. 1: 13-23.
12.Kumar, N.P., Arsad, Sh., Dwivedi, R., Kumar, A., Yadav, R.K., Singh, M.P. and Yadav, S.S. 2016. Impact of heat stress on yield and yield attributingtraits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines during grain growth development. International. J. Pure. Appl. Bio. Sci.4: 4. 179-184.
13.Mirdoraghi, M., Taghizadeh, M.S. and Behpouri, A. 2018. Characteristics of the root system in durum wheat (Triticum durum) genotype mixtures affected by water stress. 15th Natioual. Iranian. Crop. Sci. Congress. Sep. 4-6, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian)
14.Moaveni, P., Habibi, D. and Abaszadeh, B. 2009. Effect of drought stresson yield and yield components inShahr-e-Gods.J. Agron. Plan. Breed.5: 1. 69-85. (In Persian)
15.Najafian, G., Jafarnejad, A., Ghandi, A. and Nikooseresht, R. 2011. Adaptive traits related to terminal drought tolerance in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) genotypes under field conditions. Crop. Breed. J. 1: 1. 57-73. (In Persian)
16.Pireivatlou, A.S., Dehdar Masjedlou, B. and Ramiz, T.A. 2010. Evaluation of yield potential and stress adaptive trait in wheat genotypes under post anthesis drought stress conditions. Afr. J. Agri. Res. 5: 20. 2829-2836.
17.Rajala, A., Hakala, K., Makela, P., Muurinen, S. and Peltonen-Sanio, P. 2009. Spring wheat response to timing of water deficit through sink andgrain filling capacity. Field. Crop. Res. 114: 263-271.
18.Rauf, M., Munir, M., Hassan, M., Ahmed, M. and Afzai, M. 2007. Performance of wheat genotypes under osmotic stress at germination and early seedling growth stage. Afr. J. Biotech.6: 8. 971-975.
19.Sanjari Pireivatlou, A. and Yazdansepas, A. 2008. Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under pre- and post-anthesis drought stress conditions. J. Agri. Sci. Tech. 10: 2. 109-121.
20.Sanjari Pireivatlou, A., Dehdar Masjedlou, B. and Aliyev, R.T. 2010. Evaluation of yield potential and stress adaptive trait in wheat genotypes under post thesis drought stress conditions. Afr. J. Agri. Res. 5: 20. 2829-2836.
21.Saleem, M. 2003. Response of durum and bread wheat genotypes to drought stress biomass and yield components. Asian. J. Plan. Sci. 2: 3. 290-293.
22.Sio-Se Mardeh, A., Ahmadi, A., Poustini, K. and Mohammadi, V. 2006. Evaluation of drought resistance indices under various environmental conditions. Field. Crop. Res. 98: 2. 3. 222-229.
23.Zareh-FaizAbadi, A. and Emamverdian, A. 2011. Evaluation the influence of cultivar intercropping on agronomic properties and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield. I. J. Agro. 4: 144-150.
24.Tahir, M., Ketata, H., Sadeghi, E.and Amiri, A. 1999. Wheat andbarley improvement in the dry land areas of Iran: present status andfuture prospects. Agric. Res. Education. Extension Organization. (AREEO). 76p. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 544 PDF Download: 435 |
||