ارزیابی اثرات تغییر اقلیم و راهکارهای سازگاری به آن بر عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب گندم آبی (Triticum aestivum): مطالعه موردی استان خراسان رضوی

1.Alexe, C. 1995. Cultural practicesfor growing the new real winegrape cultivar Coduna at the Odobesti vineyard. Cercetari - Agro. Res. Moldavia. 27: 201-208.

2.Asbahi, S.S., Ebadi, A., Zamani, Z., Vezvaei, A., Nagavi, M. and Talaei, A. 2004. Effect of three types of education system on yield and quality of five grapevine cultivars. Iran. J. Hort. Sci. Tech. 5: 198-200. (In Persian)

3.Bruce, P.B., Patricia, A.S. and Paul, H.H. 2008. Impact of training system on vine performance and fruit composition of Traminette. J. Enol. Vitic. 59: 39-46.

 4.Cavallo, P., Poni, S. and Rotundo, A.2001. Ecophysiology and vine performance of cv. “Aglianico”' under various training systems. Sci. Hort. 87: 21-32.

5.Colova, V., Patricia, B., Parker, L., Walters, T. and Leong, S. 2007. Evaluation of yield, fruit quality and photosynthesis of two training/trellis system and canopy management practices for carlos and noble Muscadine grapes in florida. J. Int. Sci. Vign. Vin. 41: 43-49.

6.Falcão, L.D., Chaves, E.S., Burin, V.M., Falcão, A.P., Gris, E.F., Bonin, V. and Bordignon, M.T. 2008. Ripening of Cabernet Sauvignon berries from grapevines grown with two different training systems and environmental conditions in a new grape growingregion in Brazil. En línea. English ed.35: 271-282.

7.Ferree, D., Steiner, T., Gallander, J., Scurlock, D., Johns, G. and Riesen, R. 2002. Performance of ‘Seyval Blanc’ grape in four training systems over five years. Hort. Sci. 37: 1023-1027.

8.Harrell, C. and Williams, L. 1987. Net CO₂ assimilation rate of grapevine leaves in response to various training systems. Plant Physiol. 83: 457-459.

9.Harrell, D. and Williams, L. 1985. Effects of various training system on leaf net CO₂ assimilation rate of two seedless grape varieties. Plant Physiol. Sup. 77: 610-612.

10.Howell, G.S. 2006. Influence of Training System Choice and Shoot Density on Yield, Yield Components and Fruit Composition of Cabernet Franc Grapevines. (Final report). Michigan State University. 24p.

11.Jehad Agriculture Ministry. 2016. Agricultural Statistics of Iran. Ministry of Jehad Agriculture Studies Office of Statistics and Information Publications. (In Persian)

12.Kamiloğlu, Ö. 2011. The effects of rootstocks and training systems on the growth and fruit quality of the ‘Round Seedless’ grape. J. Food Agric. Environ. 10: 350-354.

13.Mahmoodzadeh, H., Rasoli, V. and Qurbanian, D. 2008. Effect of Some Training Systems onVegetative Growth, Fruit Yield and Fruit Quality of Vitis vinifera cv.Sefid Bidaneh in Takestan Region. Karaj, J. Seed P. Improv.
2: 373-387. (In Persian)

14.Palliotti, A. 2012. A new closingY-shaped training system for grapevines. Aust. J. Grape Wine R. 18: 57-63.

15.Rasoli, V. 2013. Study of compatibility of different methods of training systems of Bidaneh Sefid cultivar in Takestan region (2^th phase ). (Final report No. 44458). Qazvin Agricultural and Natural Resourses Research and Education Center, AREEO, Iran. 23p. (In Persian)

16.Rasoli, V. 2017. The effect of some grapevine training systems on yield and privalency some pests and diseases in Vitis vinifera Var. Sefid Bidaneh.Agri. Natur. Resou. Resear. J. 20: 1-8. (In Persian)

17.Roper, A. and Williams, L. 1998. Effects of training system on fruit set of Sultanina grape cultivar. J. Enol. Vitic. 54: 114-118.

18.Safran, B. and Bernstein, Z. 1973. Recent development in preparing seedless tables grapes for exoprt. Dec. Fruit Gro. 23: 108-110.

19.Singh, I. and Chauhan, K. 1980. Quality improvement in grapes. Ind. J. Hort.24: 2-8.

20.Taylor, B.K. and Leamon, K.C. 1991. Trellis effects on yield and fruit quality of five table grape varieties in the Murray valley. Aust. J. Exp. Agr.31: 85-89.

21.Wolfe, D. and Brown, G. 1995. Influence over a ten-year period of training system on yield and fruitfulness of table grape cultivars. Fruit Var. J.49: 79-81.

22.Zhang, D., Hongying, J., Xingli, C. and Xue, F.X. 1995. Studies on the essential relationship between canopy and microclimate vine growth, grape yield and berry quality. Acta Hort. Sinica.22: 110-116.