آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 14 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 682 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,081 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,993,020 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 10,066,727 |
Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in two thermal power plants: environmental impacts and carbon footprint | ||
| Environmental Resources Research | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 2، دی 2025، صفحه 221-236 اصل مقاله (1.47 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/ijerr.2025.23101.1465 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohadeseh Narouei1؛ Narjes Okati* 2؛ Fatemeh Einollahipeer2 | ||
| 1Master's degree in Environmental Science and Engineering, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This research was conducted to assess the environmental impacts and carbon footprint of the electricity production of the Zahedan gas power plant (ZGPP), and the Iranshahr combined cycle power plant (ICPP) using life cycle assessment and the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Data was collected annually for a functional unit of 1 kWh of electricity generation. The analysis of the impacts index at the midpoint level showed that the primary environmental impact from the electricity production was included the consequences of human carcinogenic toxicity with 58% for ZGPP and 52% for ICPP. Damage to human health was the highest consequence in the endpoint level index with 86% for two power plants. Based on the outcomes of the sensitivity analysis, natural gas was the most important factor affected on impacts. Also, the analysis of IPCC results showed that the consumption of fossil fuels that have the most share in global temperature potential were 97% and 63% in ZGPP, and ICPP, respectively. The highest amount of CO2 emissions per 1 kWh of electricity produced were obtained at the rates of 0.971 and 0.636 kg for ZGPP, and ICPP, respectively. According to the obtained results, although the environmental consequences of the combined cycle power plant were less compared to the gas power plant, but is still the use of liquid fuel in the combined cycle power plant is high. Therefore, it is suggested to reduce the use of this type of fuel in this power plant in order to reduce the environmental impact | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Carbon footprint؛ Life cycle assessment؛ Fossil fuels؛ IPCC؛ ReCiPe | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abyar, H., and Nowrouzi, M. 2020. Highly efficient reclamation of meat-processing wastewater by aerobic hybrid membrane bioreactor-reverse osmosis simulated system: A comprehensive economic and environmental study. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering. 8(37), 14207-14216.
Agrawal, K.K., Jain, S., Jain, A,K,, and Dahiya, S. 2014. A life cycle environmental impact assessment of natural gas combined cycle thermal power plant in Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Devlopment. 11, 162-174.
Dalir, F., Motlagh, M.S., and Ashrafi, K. 2018. A dynamic quasi comprehensive model for determining the carbon footprint of fossil fuel electricity: a case study of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production. 188, 362-370.
Detailed Statistics of Iran Power Industry. 2021. Power Generation. Specialized parent company. (In persian)
Kazemi, A., Bahramifar, N., Heydari, A., and Olsen, S.I. 2018. Life cycle assessment of nanoadsorbents at early stage technological development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 174, 527-537.
Khaki, E., Boleydei, H., Abyar, H., and Nowrouzi, M. 2023. Integrating eco-environmental assessment with energy recovery for petrochemical wastewater treatment technologies: A transition towards green and sustainable management. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 55, 104103.
Hootmirdoosti, S., Okati, N., Nowrouzi, M., and Erfani, M. 2024. Life cycle analysis of the wastewater treatment system in Zabol Industrial Town: Environmental impacts, energy demand, and greenhouse gas emissions. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 20(5), 1747-1758.
Hosseini-Fashami, F., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Hashemi, S. J., and Chau, K. W. 2019. Energy-Life cycle assessment on applying solar technologies for greenhouse strawberry production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 116, 109411.
Issakhov, A., and Mashenkova, A. 2019. Numerical study for the assessment of pollutant dispersion from a thermal power plant under the different temperature regimes. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 16, 6089-6112.
Karmaker, A.K., Rahman, M.M., Hossain, M.A., and Ahmed, M.R. 2020. Exploration and corrective measures of greenhouse gas emission from fossil fuel power stations for Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production. 244, 118645.
Liu, H., Li, Q., Li, G., and Ding, R. 2020. Life cycle assessment of environmental impact of steelmaking process. Complexity. 1, 8863941.
Malode, S., Mohanta, J.C., and Prakash, R. 2022. A review on life cycle assessment approach on thermal power generation. Materials Today: Proceedings. 56, 791-798.
Malode, S., Prakash, R., and Mohanta, J.C., 2023. A life cycle assessment of coal-fired thermal power plants with post-combustion control techniques: an India scenario. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30(39), 90639-90655.
Mirnezami, S.R., and Mohseni Cheraghlou, A. 2022. Wind Power in Iran: Technical, Policy, and Financial Aspects for Better Energy Resource Management. Energies. 15(9), 3230.
Motahari, A., Dana, T., Kargari, N., Monavari, S.M., and Jaafarzadeh Haghighi Fard, N. 2023. Life-Cycle Assessment of a Combined-Cycle Power Plant for Electricity Generation. Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research. 11(3), 147-155.
Moosavian, S.F., Hajinezhad, A., Hashemi, Z.S., and Borzuei, D. 2022. Evaluation of carbon footprint in steam and combined cycle power plants and comparison with coal-fired power plants. Journal of sustainable Energy Systems. 1(2), 97-110. (In Persian)
Naserirad, M., Kargari, N., and Nikoomaram, H. 2024. Health Impact Assessment of Thermal Power Plants Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach. Journal of Health System Research. 20(2), 177-183. (In Persian)
Nazari, S., Shahhoseini, O., Sohrabi-Kashani, A., Davari, S., Paydar, R., and Delavar-Moghadam, Z. 2010. Experimental determination and analysis of CO2, SO2 and NOx emission factors in Iran’s thermal power plants. Energy. 35(7), 2992-2998.
Orfanos, N., Mitzelos, D., Sagani, A., and Dedoussis, V. 2019. Life-cycle environmental performance assessment of electricity generation and transmission systems in Greece. Renewable Energy. 139, 1447-1462.
Odeh, N.A., and Cockerill, T.T. 2008. Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants. Energy Conversion and Management. 49(2), 212-220.
Ozcan, M. 2016. Estimation of Turkey׳s GHG emissions from electricity generation by fuel types. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 53, 832-840.
Panbechi, B., Hajinezhad, A., Yousefi, H., Moosavian, S.F., and Hajinezhad, S. 2024. Environmental, economic and energy evaluation of alternative fuels for a steam power plant: Focus on biodiesel-nanoparticles utilization. Results in Engineering. 23, 102636.
Quek, T.A., Ee, W.A., Chen, W., and Ng, T.A. 2019. Environmental impacts of transitioning to renewable electricity for Singapore and the surrounding region: A life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 214, 1-11.
Reineh, M.M., Yousefi, H., and Abolghasemi, M. 2019. A review of external costs of electricity generation emphasising on renewable energies. Journal of Renewable and New Energy. 6(1), 110-119. (In Persian)
Rezaeerad, R., Elmi, M., Samadi, R., and Nejadkoorki, F. 2019. Environmental assessment of Yazd combined cycle power plant using the LCA method. Environmental Research. 10(19), 67-77.
Saint Akadiri, S., Alola, A.A., Olasehinde-Williams, G., and Etokakpan, M.U. 2020. The role of electricity consumption, globalization and economic growth in carbon dioxide emissions and its implications for environmental sustainability targets. Science of the Total Environment.708, 134653.
Shorabeh, S.N., Samany, N.N., Minaei, F., Firozjaei, H.K., Homaee, M., and Boloorani, A.D. 2022. A decision model based on decision tree and particle swarm optimization algorithms to identify optimal locations for solar power plants construction in Iran. Renewable Energy. 187, 56-67.
Song, Q., Wang, Z., Li, J., Duan, H., Yu, D., and Liu, G. 2018. Comparative life cycle GHG emissions from local electricity generation using heavy oil, natural gas, and MSW incineration in Macau. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 81, 2450-2459.
Tabesh, M., Feizee Masooleh, M., Roghani, B., and Motevallian, S.S. 2019. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) of wastewater treatment plants: a case study of Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 17, 1155-1169.
Technical Committee ISO/TC 207 EM. 2006. Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework: International Organization for Standardization.
Wang, R., Jiang, L., Wang, Y., and Roskilly, A.P. 2020. Energy saving technologies and mass-thermal network optimization for decarbonized iron and steel industry: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 274, 122997.
Weisser, D. 2007. A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy. 32(9), 1543-1559.
Yang, Q., Zhou, H., Zhang, X., Nielsen, C.P., Li, J., Lu, X., Yanga, H., and Chen, H. 2018. Hybrid life-cycle assessment for energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of a typical biomass gasification power plant in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 205, 661-671.
Zuffi, C., Manfrida, G., Asdrubali, F., and Talluri, L. 2022. Life cycle assessment of geothermal power plants: A comparison with other energy conversion technologies. Geothermics. 104, 102434. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 583 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 279 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب