آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 14 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 689 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,127 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 11,361,895 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 10,293,840 |
Testicular Morpho-histometry and Semen Quality of Three Strains of Chickens | ||
| Poultry Science Journal | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 6، شماره 2، اسفند 2018، صفحه 173-179 اصل مقاله (897.09 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/psj.2018.15070.1332 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| DE Ochai1؛ DJU Kalla1؛ B Saleh* 2؛ YP Mancha1 | ||
| 1Department of Animal Production, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Bauchi, Nigeria | ||
| 2Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria | ||
| چکیده | ||
| A study was conducted to compare the testicular morphology and semen quality of three strains (FUNAAB-Alpha, ISA brown and Bantam) of chickens. A total of 45, thirty four week old cocks were used for the six months study. Semen samples were collected weekly by abdominal massage technique and semen volume, colour, pH, motility, percentage live, normal and sperm concentration were evaluated. Testes and Vas deferens were collected from all the cocks at the end of the experimental period and their gross morphological data recorded. Strain influenced (p < 0.05) gross testicular morphology. Weights of paired testes were 23.98, 23.23, and 11.80 g for the FUNAAB-alpha, Isa brown and Bantam, respectively. Testicular weight (paired, left, and right) and lengths were consistently lower (p < 0.05) for the Bantam. Testicular width was similar among the three strains. Gross motility was similar for the FUNAAB- alpha (79.82%) and ISA brown (81.18%) while the Bantam (54.63%) had the lowest (p < 0.05) mean. Sperm concentration was highest (p < 0.001) for the Bantam while the other two had similar values. It was concluded that the FUNAAB- alpha compared favourably with the ISA brown but was superior to the Bantam in semen quality and testicular morphology. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Bantam؛ Isa brown؛ Sperm motility؛ FUNAAB-alpha؛ Testicular morphology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdurehman A& Urge M. 2016. Evaluation of fertility, hatchability and egg quality of rural chicken in Gorogutu district, Eastern Hararghe, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 10: 111-116.
Ameen SA, Opayemi OS, Ajayi JA& Adediwura MA. 2014. Evaluation of Semen Quality of Five Different Cockerel Breed used in Poultry Industry in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Issues and Agriculture in Developing Countries, 6: 30–36.
Anderson J. 2001. The semen of animals and its use for artificial insemination. Green World Publishers India.
Cheng FP, Guo TJ, Wu TJ, Lin TE, Ursem PJF, Colenbrander B & Fung HP. 2002. Annual variation in semen characteristics of pigeons (Columba livia). Poultry Science,81: 1050–1056.DOI: 10.1093/ps/81.7.1050
Baker FJ & Silverton RE. 1985. Introduction to Medical Laboratory Technology. Butterworths, London.
Bancroft JD & Stevens A. 1972. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingston, Edinburg, London New York.
Chidozie OG, Ugochukwu N & Kenneth A. 2010. Morphometric study of the testes of the Nigerian local breed of chicken. Animal Research International, 7: 1163–1168.
Donoghue AM & Wishart GJ. 2000. Storage of poultry semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 62: 213-232. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00160-3
Getachew T. 2016. A Review Article of Artificial Insemination in Poultry. World's Veterinary Journal, 6: 25-33.
Giza, L. 2016. Semen characteristics and in vitro preservation in the racing pigeon (Columba livia): a model approach for domestic and wild pigeon species. Masters Dissertation, Faculty of Veterinary Medecine, Ghent University.
Hambu EK, Arifiantini RI, Purwantara B & Darwati S. 2016. Raw Semen Characteristics of Three Different Indonesian Local Roosters. Animal Production, 18:165-172.
Hrnčár C, Gič D & Bujko J. 2012. The effect of eggshell quality on hatchability of pure chicken breeds. Animal Science and Biotechnologies,45: 415–418.
Kuster CE, Singer RS & Althouse GC. 2004. Determining sample size for the morphological assessment of sperm. Theriogenology, 61: 691–703.DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00240-1
Lake PE. 1966. A cytochemical examination of spermatozoa of the domestic fowl. Research in Veterinary Science, 7: 121–127.
Lake PE. 1981. Male genital organs. In: King, AS and McLleland, J. (eds.) Form and Function in Birds. Academic Press, London, Pp. 1 – 61.
Machebe NS & Ezekwe AG. 2004. Ejaculate characteristics of three genotypes of local cocks in the humid tropics. Journal of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension, 3: 33–37.
Malik A, Haron A, Yusoff R, Nesa M, Bukar M & Kasim A. 2013. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken, and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37: 564-568. DOI:10.3906/vet-1107-26.
Obidi JA, Onyeanusi BI, Rekwot PI, Ayo JO & Dzenda T. 2008. Seasonal variations in seminal characteristics of Shika brown breeder cocks. International Journal of Poultry Science,7: 1219–1223.
Ojedapo LO, Akinokun O, Adedeji TA, Olayeni TB, Ameen SA& Amao SR. 2008. Effect of strain and sex on carcass characteristics of three commercial broilers reared in deep litter system in the derived savannah area of Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4: 487-491.
Omeje SSI & Marine BN. 1990. Evaluation of se- men characteristics of adult cocks of different genetic background. Theriogenology, 24: 1111-1118. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(05)80010-X
Packard R. 2014. Comparison of production parameters and meat quality characteristics of South African indigenous chickens. MSc thesis, Stellenbosch University.
Partyka A, Niżański W & Ochota M. 2012. Methods of Assessment of Cryopreserved Semen. In: Katkov, I. (Ed.), Current Frontiers in Cryobiology, InTech. Retrieved February 2, 2013 from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/current-frontiers-in-cryobiology/methods-of-assessment-of-cryopreserved-semen
Peters SO, Omidiji EA, Ikeobi CON, Ozoje MO & Adebambo OA. 2004. Effect of Naked neck and frizzled genes on egg traits, fertility and hatchability in local chickens. In: self sufficiency of Animal production in Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria. Ebony State University, Nigeria, Sept. 13-16, 2004. Pp: 262-264.
Peters SO, Shoyebo OD, Ilori BM, Ozoje MO, Ikeobi CON & Adebambo AO. 2008. Semen quality traits of seven strain of chickens raised in the humid tropics. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7: 949-953.
Saleh B. 2017. Effect of varying dietary energy and protein on reproductive performance of FUNAAB-alpha chickens. PhD Dissertation, Department of Animal Production, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi. 245 pages.
Saleh B, Kalla DJU, Mbap ST, DomaUD & Girgiri AY. 2017. Effects of varying dietary energy and protein levels on gross morphology and histology of testes of breeder FUNAAB – Alpha cocks. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 44:25–33.
Santiago‑Moreno, J, Esteso1, MC, Villaverde‑Morcillo, S, Toledano‑Diaz, A, Castaño1, C, Velázquez, R, Lopez‑Sebastian, A, Goya, AL & Martínez, JG. 2016. Recent advances in bird sperm morphometric analysis and its role in male gamete characterization and reproduction technologies. Asian Journal of Andrology,18: 882–888.DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.188660
Siudzinska A & Lukaszewicz E. 2008. Effect of semen extenders and storage time on sperm morphology of four chicken breeds. Applied Poultry Research,17: 101–108.
Sonseeda P, Vongpralub T & Laopaiboon B. 2013. Effects of Environmental Factors, Ages and Breeds on Semen Characteristics in Thai Indigenous Chickens: A One-year Study. Thailand Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 43: 347-352.
Sturkie PD. & Opel H. 1976. Reproduction in the male, fertilization, and early embryonic development. In: Sturkie, P. D. (Ed.), Avian Reproduction (3rd Ed.), Springer- Verlag, New York.
Ubah SA, Muhammad SA, Obudu CE & Ogunbodede MA. 2017. Semen Quality of Cockerel Breeders Gallus domesticus in Two Climates in Nigeria. Biomedical Sciences, 3: 21-27. DOI: 10.11648/j.bs.20170301.14. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,153 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,211 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب