آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 14 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 674 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,006 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,321,580 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 9,519,704 |
Particles Size as Feed Quality Parameter in Ghana - A Case Study of Dormaa Municipality | ||
| Poultry Science Journal | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 6، شماره 2، اسفند 2018، صفحه 109-117 اصل مقاله (872.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Short Communication | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22069/psj.2018.15159.1338 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| TA AGYEI* 1؛ A Addo2 | ||
| 1CSIR-Animal Research Institute, Accra Ghana | ||
| 2Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana | ||
| چکیده | ||
| There is a general agreement between researchers that particle size of poultry feed should be between the size ranges of 600-900 µm. This study investigated the particle size of poultry feed produced in the Dormaa Municipality of Ghana. A survey was conducted on various feed mills which were made up of nine on-farm mills and five community-based commercial mills. Feed samples were collected from each mill and analyzed using the sieving method for the particle size. The results showed that 42% of mills produced feed coarser than the accepted particle size ranges of 600-900 µm. The geometric mean diameter (GMD) of the samples ranged from 608-1791 µm. A comparison of the on-farm and commercial feed mills showed that there was no significant difference (p = 0.669) between GMDs of the feed produced by the commercial and on-farm mills. This study confirmed that particle size analysis should be carried out routinely at the feed mills, in order to control the quality of the feed being produced. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Particle size؛ Poultry feed؛ Size distribution؛ Geometric mean diameter | ||
| مراجع | ||
ReferencesAddo A, Bart-Plange A & Akowuah JO. 2012. Particle size evaluation of feed ingredient produced in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 7: 177-181. Amerah AM, Ravindran V, Lentle RG & Thomas DG. 2007. Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World's Poultry Science Journal, 63: 439-455.DOI: 10.1017/S0043933907001560 ASAE, 2008. Method of Determining and Expressing Fineness of Feed Materials by Sieving., ANSI/ASAE S319.4 FEB03, American Society of Agricultural Engineers,Michigan, USA. Avila VD, Jaenisch FRF, Pieniz LC, Ledur MC, Albino LFT & Oliveira PD. 1992. Produção e manejo de frangos de corte. Concórdia: EMBRAPA-CNPSA.https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/433992/1/doc28.pdf Brown ISA. 2007. General Management Guide for ISA Hens. ISA BV, Boxmeer, the Netherlands. Dozier WA. 2002. Reducing utility cost in the feed mill. Watt Poultry USA, 53: 40-44. Dritz SS & Hancock JD. 1999. Grain particle size: Influence on swine and poultry performance and practical methods for monitoring. American Soybean Association Technical Bulletin, 632 pages. Ensminger ME. Oldfield JE & Heinemann WW. 1990. Feeds and nutrition digest: formerly, Feeds and nutrition--abridged. 2nd ed. Ensminger Publishing Co., Clovis, CA. FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization. 2014. Poultry Sector Ghana, FAO animal Production and Health. Livestock Country Review.http://www.fao.org/docrep/019/i3663e/i3663e.pdf
Goodband RD, Tokach MD & Nelssen JL. 2002. The effects of diet particle size on animal performance. Kansas: MF-2050 Feed Manufacturing.https://www.bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/mf2050.pdf
Herrman T. 2001. Sampling: Procedures for Feed. MF2036. Kansas State University. 8 pages. Koch K. 1996. Hammermills and rollermills. MF-2048 Feed Manufacturing. Department of Grain Science Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan. Lohmann B. 2005. Guide for laying hens: Lohmann Brown-Classic. Lohman tierzuct GmbH, Cuxhaven, Germany. Lott BD, Day EJ, Deaton JW & May JD. 1992. The effect of temperature, dietary energy level, and corn particle size on broiler performance. Poultry Science, 71: 618-624.DOI:10.3382/ps.0710618
Midwest Laboratories.2014. Particle Size
Analysis For Swine Feeds. Omaha:Midwest laboratories. Available from:https://www.midwestlabs.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/09/f406_particle_size_analysis_for_swine_feeds.pdf. Accessed on 20th March, 2016.
Neves DP, Banhazi TM & Nääs IA. 2014. Feeding behaviour of broiler chickens: a review on the biomechanical characteristics. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 16: 1-16. Nir I, Shefet G & Aaroni Y. 1994. Effect of particle size on performance 1. Corn. Poultry Science, 73: 45-49. DOI:10.3382/ps.0730045
Oppong-Sekyere D, Donkoh A & Addo A. 2012. Effect of feed particle size on growth performance of broiler chickens in ghana. International Journal of Plant and Animal Science, 2: 241-247. Pfost H & Headley V. 1976. Methods of determining and expressing particle size, In: H. Pfost (ed), Feed Manufacturing Technology II - Appendix C., Am. Feed Manufacturers Assoc., Arlington, VA.
Reece FN, Lott BD & Deaton JW. 1985. The effects of feed form, grinding method, energy level, and gender on broiler performance in a moderate (21 oC) environment. Poultry Science, 64: 1834-1839. DOI:10.3382/ps.0641834
Reece FN, Lott BD & Deaton JW. 1986. Effects of environmental temperature and corn particle size on response of broilers to pelleted feed. Poultry Science, 65: 636-641.DOI:10.3382/ps.0650636
Schmider EZ, Danay M, Beyer E & Bühner LM. 2010. Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6: 147.DOI: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000016 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,257 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,666 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب