Investigation the effect of Zytonic on Yield and Yield components of Quinoa under irrigated Unconventional water | ||
| مجله پژوهشهای حفاظت آب و خاک | ||
| Volume 27, Issue 3, September and October 2020, Pages 229-244 PDF (714.59 K) | ||
| Document Type: Complete scientific research article | ||
| DOI: 10.22069/jwsc.2020.14856.2999 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Saber Jamali1; Hossein Sharifan* 2 | ||
| 1Water Engineering Department, ferdowsi university of mashhad, mashhad, Iran. | ||
| 2Water engineering department, ferdowsi university of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background and objectives: Increasing population growth along with the freshwater resources global crisis necessitates the use of unconventional water resources in agriculture, as the largest fresh water consumer, especially in the arid and semiarid areas. Soil physical condition is one factor that can limit crop production. Poor soil physical condition can restrict water intake into the soil and subsequent movement, plant root development and aeration of the soil. Materials and methods: Investigation the effect of different water quality and Zytonic on yield and yield components of Quinoa (cv. Titicaca). the research was conducted as a factorial experiment based on completely randomized design including 3 replications as pot planting in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in Greenhouse conditions, during 2017-2018. In this study, water quality included (freshwater, wastewater, fishery wastewater and saline water) and Zytonic included (0 and 1 kgm-2). Results: The results showed that effect of different water quality on leaf number, branches number, shoot dry weight, plant height, stem diameter, SPAD index, and leaf area was significant at 1 percent level (p < 0.01), but on shoot fresh weight was significant at 5 percent level (p < 0.05). The results showed that effect of different zytonic levels on leaf number, and shoot dry weight, stem diameter, SPAD index, and leaf area was significant at 1 percent level (p < 0.01), but on shoot dry weight was significant at 5 percent level (p < 0.05). Interactions between water quality and zytonic levels leaf number, and shoot dry weight was significant at 1 percent level (p < 0.01), but on branches number, shoot fresh weight, and stem diameter was significant at 5 percent level (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, all of this parameter decreased significantly with irrigation by saline water. in this study, increased all of this parameter with irrigation by wastewater and fishery wastewater. Wastewater and fishery wastewater has resulted to increasing of shoot fresh weight 6.9 and 12.9 percent and shoot fresh weight 13.2 and 16.9 percent, respectively. Saline water has resulted to decreasing of shoot fresh and dry weight 31.2 and 39.6 percent, respectively. Zytonic has resulted to increasing of shoot fresh and dry weight 41.4 and 16.3 percent, respectively. increasing of shoot fresh weight 6.9 and 12.9 percent and shoot fresh weight 13.2 and 16.9 percent, respectively. Saline water has resulted to decreasing of shoot fresh and dry weight 31.2 and 39.6 percent, respectively. Zytonic has resulted to increasing of shoot fresh and dry weight 41.4 and 16.3 percent, respectively. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Fishery wastewater; Quinoa; Saline water; Wastewater; Zytonic | ||
| References | ||
|
1.Abdelraouf, R.E. 2017. Reuse of Fish Farm Drainage Water in Irrigation. In: Negm A. (eds) Unconventional Water Resources and Agriculture in Egypt. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry. 75: 393-410.
2.Algosaibi, A.M., El-Garawany, M.M., Badran, A.E., and Almadini, A.M. 2015. Effect of Irrigation Water Salinity on the Growth of Quinoa Plant Seedlings. J. Agric. Sci. 7: 8. 205-214.
3.Ashraf, M. 2001. Relation between growth and gas exchange characteristics in some salt tolerance amphidiploid Brassica species in relation to their diploid parents. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 45: 2. 155-163.
4.Ason, B., Ababio, F.O., Boateng, E., and Yangyuoru, M. 2014. Full Length Research Paper Efficacy of Zytonic Soil Conditioner on two Ghanaian Soils using Sweet Pepper and Maize as test crops. Adv. J. Agric. Res. 2: 10. 152-158.
5.Bilalis, D., Kakabouki, I., Karkanis, A., Travlos, I., Triantafyllidis, V., and Dimitra, H.E.L.A. 2012. Seed and saponin production of organic quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) for different tillage and fertilization. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 40: 1. 42-46.
6.El Youssfi, L., Choukr-Allah, R., Zaafrani, M., Mediouni, T., Samba, B., and Hirich, A. 2012. Effect of domestic treated wastewater use on three varieties of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under semiarid conditions. World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology. Inter. J. Environ. Chem. Ecol. Geol. Geophysic. Engin. 6: 8. 562-565.
7.Hassanli, A.M., Ebrahimizadeh, M.A., and Beecham, S. 2009. The effect of irrigation methods with effluent and irrigation scheduling on water use efficiency and corn yields in an arid region. Agricultural Water Management 96: 1. 93-99.
8.Hirich, A., Allah, R.C., Jacobsen, S.E.,El Youssfi, L., and El Homaria, H. 2012. Using deficit irrigation with treated wastewater in the production of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Morocco. Revista Científica UDO Agrícola. 12: 3. 570-583.
9.Jacobsen, S.E., Monteros, C., Christiansen, J.L., Bravo, L.A., Corcuera, L.J., and Mujica, A. 2005: Plant responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to frost at various phonological stages. Europ. J. Agron.22: 2. 131-139.
10.Jamali, S. 2017. Investigation of the effect of different salinity and deficit irrigation levels on yield and yield components of Quinoa (Cv. Titicaca). M.Sc. thesis. Gorgan university of Agriculture Science and Natural Resource.
11.Kafi, M., Salehi, M., and Eshghizadeh, H.R. 2011. Biosaline Agriculture- plant, water and soil management Approaches. Iranian academic center for education culture and research of Mashhad. (In Persian) 12.Kerepesi, H., and Galiba, G. 2000. Osmotic and salt stress induced alteration in soluble carbohydrate content in wheat seedling. Crop Science. 40: 2. 482-487.
13.Khan, Q., Akhtar, F., Jamil, M., Sayal, O., Mirza, N., and Mubarak, H. 2014. Studies on different concentration of lead (Pb) and sewage water on Pb uptake and growth of Radish (Raphanus sativus). Euras. J. Soil Sci. 3: 2. 138.
14.Malekian, R., Heidarpour, M., Mostafazadehfard, B., and Abedi Koupaei, J. 2008. Effect of surface and sub-surface irrigation with treated wastewater on bermudagrass properties. Agriculture science and natural resources. 15: 4. 248-257. (In Persian)
15.Munns, R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soil: some dogmas and hypotheses.Plant Cell Environment. 16: 1. 15-24.
16.Munns, R., and Tester, M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology.59: 651-681.
17.Panuccio, M.R., Jacobsen, S.E., Akhtar, S.S., and Muscolo, A. 2014. Effect of saline water on seed germination and early seedling growth of the halophyte quinoa. AoB Plants. 6: 047.
18.Razzaghi F., Plauborg, F., Jacobsen, S.E., Jensen, C.R., and Andersen, M.N. 2012. Effect of nitrogen and water availability of three soil types on yield, radiation use efficiency and evapotranspiration in field-grown quinoa. Agriculture water management. 109: 20-29.
19.Ruley, A.T., Sharma, N.C., and Sahi, S.V. 2004. Antioxidant defense in a lead accumulation plant, Sesbania drummondii. Plant Physiology and Biochemical. 42: 11. 899-906.
20.Sajadi, F., Sharifan, H., Hezarjaribi, A., and Ghorbani nasrabad Gh. 2017. The effect of salinity stress and over irrigation on yield and yield components of green pepper. Water and irrigation management. 6: 1. 89-100. (In Persian)
21.Stewart, B.A. 2008. Irrigation sewage effluent use. Encyclopedia of Water Science, second edition. 81: 664-665.
22.Zamani, S., Nezami, M.T., Habibi, D., and Baybordi A. 2010. Study of yield and yield components of winter Rapeseed under salt stress conditions. Crop Production Research. 1: 2. 109-121.(In Persian)
23.Zhu, J.K. 2001. Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science. 6: 2. 66-71. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 929 PDF Download: 588 |
||