Studying of chloroplast diversity in some apple genotypes from North-West of Iran in comparison of some Alborz genotypes, commercial cultivars and rootstocks | ||
| پژوهشهای تولید گیاهی | ||
| Article 1, Volume 25, Issue 2, September 2018, Pages 1-15 PDF (567.83 K) | ||
| Document Type: original paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22069/jopp.2018.9335.2202 | ||
| Authors | ||
| shahin jahangirzadeh khiavi* 1; Masoumeh Ashourpour2; shabnaz KESHAVARZI3 | ||
| 1Tea Research Center, Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Agricultural Research,Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Lahijan, Iran | ||
| 2Organization of Agriculture Jahad, Gilan, Rasht | ||
| 3Department of Organic chemistry, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Background and objectives: Apple is one of the most important fruit products in temperate regions. The cultivation of this product has been done during a very long time in Iran and even according to some resources; Iran has been called as one of the hometowns of this plant. The most basic step in breeding programs for fruit trees is collecting and evaluating internal and external germplasm resources. Nowadays considering the importance of healthy eating and sustainable production of apple with higher quality, modifying apple trees, is essentially based on “resistance genes”. Given that most apple varieties are being propagated asexually, low genetic diversity is expected. But among genotypes that are the result of the upgrade, expected diversity increases because these genotypes are mostly seed progenies. In this study we have tried to evaluate the genetic diversity of organelles of some local genotypes of apple cultivated on the main cultivation areas in North West of Iran and Central Alborz and compare them with two commercial cultivars (Red Delicious and Fuji) and also M4 and M9. Materials and Methods: For this investigation, young, fully developed leaves were sampled, their DNA genomes were extracted. In order to evaluate organelles diversity, 30 apples, four pairs of specific primers for the chloroplast genome (K1K2, CS, HK and TF) and two restriction enzymes (EcoRI and MseI) in Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences (CAPS) method were used. NTSYS and POPGENE were used for data analysis. Results: Among these four markers, three markers have the ability to amplify appropriately, in which 4.13% of apple chloroplast genomes were amplified. By haplotype examination of samples, a total of eight haplotypes were identified which among them, H4 was the largest group with 26.66 percent of the total samples. All this groupings have been created due to the occurrence of mutations and/or deletions. Mean of genetic variation within (HS), Total (HT) and degree of genetic differentiations (GST) were 0.4451, 0.467 and 0.0481, respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that there is no systematic genetic structure between samples of studied regions. These results also confirmed the possibility of applying Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences (CAPS) method to identify genotypes and varieties of apples. Using these markers, genetic diversity in organelle DNA was observed amongst apple genotypes, however, this variation was not able to separate the genotypes in different regions. It seems perhaps by increasing the number of primers and restriction enzymes, this distinction can be achieved. The results of this study showed that native apple genotypes in Iran, posses high genetic diversity due to sexual reproduction in the past. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Malus; haplotype; Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences (CAPS); general primer chloroplasts; restriction enzymes | ||
| References | ||
|
1.Arnold, M.L., Buckner, C.M. and Robinson, J.J. 1991. Pollen-mediated introgression and hybrid speciation in Louisiana irises. Proc. Nat. Acad Sci. USA. 88: 1398-1402. 2.Bouhadida, M., Martín, J.P., Eremin, G., Pinochet, J., Moreno, M.Á. and Gogorcena, Y. 2007. Chloroplast DNA diversity in Prunus and its implication on genetic relationships. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 132 :5. 670-679. 3.Coart, E., Van Glabeke, S., De Loose, M., Larsen, A.S. and Roldan-Ruiz, I. 2006. Chloroplast diversity in the genus Malus: New insights into the relationship between the European wild apple (Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill.) and the domesticated apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Mol Ecol. 15: 2171-2182. 4.Demesure, B., Comps, B. and Petit, R.J. 1996. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Europe. Evolution. 50: 2515-2520. 5.Demesure, B., Sodzi, N. and Petit, R.J. 1995. A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol Ecol. 4: 129-131. 6.Dumolin-Lapegue, S., Pemonge, M.. and Petit, R.J. 1997. An enlarged set of consensus primers for the study of organelle DNA in plants. Mol. Ecol. 6: 393-397. 7.El-Mousadik, A. and Petit, R.J. 1996. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the argan tree of Morocco. Mol. Eco. 5: 547-555. 8.Fofona, B., Harvengt, L., Baudoin, J.P. and Du Jardin, P. 1997. New primers for the polymerase chain reaction of cpDNA intergenic spacers in Phaseolus phylogeny. Belg. J. Bot. 129: 118-122. 9.Golein, B., Bigonah, M., Azadvar, M. and Golmohammadi, M. 2012. Analysis of genetic relationship between ‘Bakraee’ (Citrus sp.) and some known Citrus genotypes through SSR and PCR-RFLP markers. Sci. Hort. 148: 147-153. 10.Grivet, D., Heinze, B., Vendraminà, G.G. and Petit, R.J. 2001. Genome walking with consensus primers: Application to the large single copy region of chloroplast DNA. Mol. Ecol. Not. 1: 345-349. 11.Heinze, B. 1998. PCR based chloroplast DNA assay for the identification of native Populus nigra and introduced poplar hybrids in Europe. Forest Genet. 5: 33-40. 12.http://www.diversityarrays.com/sites/default/files/pub/DArT_DNA_isolation.pdf. 13.Ishikawa, S., Kato, S., Imakawa, S., Mikami, T. and Shimamoto, Y. 1992. Organel DNA polymorphism in apple cultivars and rootstocks. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 963-967. 14.Jahangirzadeh Khiavi, Sh., Zamani, Z., Mardi, M. and Fatahi Moghdam, M. 2013. Evaluation of chloroplast relationship between some apple genotype from Azerbaijan of Iran and their comparison with other local genotypes, cultivars and rootstocks. Afri. J. Agri. Res. 8: 1. 106-112. 15.Jahangirzadeh Khiavi, Sh. and Keshavarzi, Sh. 2016. Study of chloroplast haplotypes distribution in some apple genotypes from central Alborz region by using PBR method. Third international and sixth confrence of medical herbs and stable agricalture. December 11. Iran. Hamedan. (In Persian) 16.Jahangirzadeh Khiavi, Sh., Hamidoghli, Y., Golein, B. and Sabouri, A. 2017. Haplotype Identification of Some Lime Genotypes from Minab Region by Usage of Chloroplast Genome. First International Conference & 10th National Horticultural Science Congress of Iran (IrHC2017). September 4-7. Iran. Tehran. (In Persian) 17.Mabberley, D.J., Jarvis, C.E. and Juniper, B.E. 2001. The name of the apple. Telopea J. 9: 421-430. 18.Mariac, C., Trouslot, P., Poteaux, C., Bezancon, G. and Renno, J.F. 2000. Chloroplast DNA extraction from herbaceous and woody plants for direct restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Biotechniques. 28: 110-113. 19.Mohanty, A., Martín, J.P. and Aguinagalde, I. 2001. Chloroplast DNA study in wild populations and some cultivars of Prunus avium L. . Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 112-117. 20.Mohanty, A., Martin, J.P., Gonzalez, L.M. and Aguinagalde, I. 2003. Association between chloroplast DNA and mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Prunus spinosa L. (Rosaceae) populations across Europe. Ann. Botany. 92: 749-755. 21.Mohanty, A., M., J.P. and Aguinagalde, I. 2000. Chloroplast DNA diversity within and among populations of the allotetraploid Prunus spinosa L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 1304-1310. 22.Palmer, J.D. and Stein, D.B. 1986. Conservation of chloroplast genome structure among vascular plant. Curr. Genet. 10: 823-833. 23.Panda, S., Pedro Martin, J. and Aguinaglde, I. 2003. Chloroplast DNA study in sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.) using PCR-RFLP method. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 50: 489-495. 24.Petit, R.J., Kremer, A. and Wagner, D.B. 1993a. Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in European oaks. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 122-128. 25.Phipps, J.B., Robertson, K.R., Smith, P.G. and Rohrer, J.R. 1990. A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Can J. Bot. 68: 10. 2209-2269. 26.Sears, B.B. 1980. Elimination of plastids during spermatogenesis and fertilization in the plant kingdom. Plasmid. 4: 233-255. 27.Sugiura, M. 2003. History of chloroplast genomics. Photosyn Res. 76: 371-377. 28.Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. and Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17: 1105-1109. 29.Turkec, A., Sayar, M. and Heinze, B. 2006. Identification of sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.) and analysis of their genetic relationships by chloroplast sequence-characterised amplified regions (cpSCAR). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 53: 1635-1641. 30.Weising, K. and Gardner, R.C. 1999. A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms. Genome. 42: 9-19. 31.Whatley, J.M. 1982. Ultrastructure of plastid inheritance: Green algae to angiosperms. Biol. Rev. 57: 527-569. 32.Zeinalabedini, M., Mahjourhat, K., Khayam-Nekoui, M., Grigorian, V., Toorchi, M., Dicenta, F. and Martinez-Gomez, P. 2007. Molecular characterization of almond cultivars and related wild species using nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers. J. Food. Agri. Envir. 5: 3&4. 242-247. 33.Zohary, D. and Hopf, M. 2001. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Cultivated Plants in West Asia, Europe, and the Nile Valley. Oxford University Press. 328p. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 913 PDF Download: 834 |
||